<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: what you read what i read, part ii</title>
	<atom:link href="http://bigother.com/2009/11/23/what-you-read-what-i-read-part-ii/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://bigother.com/2009/11/23/what-you-read-what-i-read-part-ii/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 29 May 2012 23:21:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Madera</title>
		<link>http://bigother.com/2009/11/23/what-you-read-what-i-read-part-ii/#comment-564</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[John Madera]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 04:25:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bigother.com/?p=1354#comment-564</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thumbs up to &lt;em&gt;Europeana&lt;/em&gt;. Have you seen Céline Bourhis’s &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.dalkeyarchive.com/article/show/194&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;interview with Patrik Ouredník&lt;/a&gt;. Here’s Ouredník answering what writers influenced his book:

&lt;blockquote&gt;“Only one critic mentioned the name of Kurt Vonnegut when writing about &lt;em&gt;Europeana&lt;/em&gt;, and he is an author to whom I owe a lot, especially &lt;em&gt;Slaughterhouse-Five&lt;/em&gt; and &lt;em&gt;Breakfast of Champions&lt;/em&gt;.”&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Makes sense to me.

And more from Ourednik about how he conceived &lt;em&gt;Europeana&lt;/em&gt;:

&lt;blockquote&gt;In any case, my goal was not to conceive of the twentieth century as a theme—not even in the sense of a “reflection theme”—but as a literary figure. The primary question wasn’t to know what events, what episodes were characteristic of the twentieth century, but which syntax, which rhetoric, which expressiveness belonged to it, in what sense was it redundant, etc.

I could simplify this: what were the key words of the twentieth century? Undoubtedly, haste (rather than ”chaos,” which is no more appropriate to the twentieth century than to any another). This meant, let’s try to write a hurried text. Another peculiarity of the twentieth century, I think, is infantilism—with everything that it implies, from the romantic-commercial image of juvenility to the refusal of taking the full responsibility of one’s acts and words. Let’s try then to write a childish text, a text that could have been told by a kid reciting his lesson or by the village idiot. Thirdly, this century has been explicitly scientific. This meant, let’s use a vocabulary more or less scientific, with all its contradictions and, if possible, with all its vacuity. These are the elements that gave birth to the form and content of the book.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

I’ve got &lt;em&gt;The Failure Six&lt;/em&gt; on my queue and I can’t wait to read it. 

As for what I read this week: &lt;em&gt;MLKNG SCKLS&lt;/em&gt;, by Justin Sirois, &lt;em&gt;Kamby Bolongo Mean River&lt;/em&gt;, by Robert Lopez, &lt;em&gt;Interfictions 2: An Anthology of Interstitial Writing&lt;/em&gt;, and I’m halfway through &lt;em&gt;Grammar Desk Reference&lt;/em&gt;, by Gary Lutz and Diane Stevenson.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thumbs up to <em>Europeana</em>. Have you seen Céline Bourhis’s <a href="http://www.dalkeyarchive.com/article/show/194" rel="nofollow">interview with Patrik Ouredník</a>. Here’s Ouredník answering what writers influenced his book:</p>
<blockquote><p>“Only one critic mentioned the name of Kurt Vonnegut when writing about <em>Europeana</em>, and he is an author to whom I owe a lot, especially <em>Slaughterhouse-Five</em> and <em>Breakfast of Champions</em>.”</p></blockquote>
<p>Makes sense to me.</p>
<p>And more from Ourednik about how he conceived <em>Europeana</em>:</p>
<blockquote><p>In any case, my goal was not to conceive of the twentieth century as a theme—not even in the sense of a “reflection theme”—but as a literary figure. The primary question wasn’t to know what events, what episodes were characteristic of the twentieth century, but which syntax, which rhetoric, which expressiveness belonged to it, in what sense was it redundant, etc.</p>
<p>I could simplify this: what were the key words of the twentieth century? Undoubtedly, haste (rather than ”chaos,” which is no more appropriate to the twentieth century than to any another). This meant, let’s try to write a hurried text. Another peculiarity of the twentieth century, I think, is infantilism—with everything that it implies, from the romantic-commercial image of juvenility to the refusal of taking the full responsibility of one’s acts and words. Let’s try then to write a childish text, a text that could have been told by a kid reciting his lesson or by the village idiot. Thirdly, this century has been explicitly scientific. This meant, let’s use a vocabulary more or less scientific, with all its contradictions and, if possible, with all its vacuity. These are the elements that gave birth to the form and content of the book.</p></blockquote>
<p>I’ve got <em>The Failure Six</em> on my queue and I can’t wait to read it. </p>
<p>As for what I read this week: <em>MLKNG SCKLS</em>, by Justin Sirois, <em>Kamby Bolongo Mean River</em>, by Robert Lopez, <em>Interfictions 2: An Anthology of Interstitial Writing</em>, and I’m halfway through <em>Grammar Desk Reference</em>, by Gary Lutz and Diane Stevenson.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ryan W. Bradley</title>
		<link>http://bigother.com/2009/11/23/what-you-read-what-i-read-part-ii/#comment-560</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ryan W. Bradley]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 02:16:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bigother.com/?p=1354#comment-560</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[there has to be someone who takes it to that place, that&#039;s why i was invented.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>there has to be someone who takes it to that place, that&#8217;s why i was invented.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lily Hoang</title>
		<link>http://bigother.com/2009/11/23/what-you-read-what-i-read-part-ii/#comment-559</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Lily Hoang]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 02:04:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bigother.com/?p=1354#comment-559</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[oh yeah, i forgot to give a huge ass THANK YOU to A.D. Jameson for letting me pilfer his dalkey books. without you, adam, this list would be pitiful!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>oh yeah, i forgot to give a huge ass THANK YOU to A.D. Jameson for letting me pilfer his dalkey books. without you, adam, this list would be pitiful!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lily Hoang</title>
		<link>http://bigother.com/2009/11/23/what-you-read-what-i-read-part-ii/#comment-558</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Lily Hoang]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 02:02:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bigother.com/?p=1354#comment-558</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ryan: that&#039;s just scary, man. you should never type something like that, or press the publish button.

Matt: what else can be said? we loves us some shane jones. &amp; Babyfucker is worth it. i read it in one sitting. i also like small, pretty books, and it&#039;s a very small pretty book!

John: i&#039;m pretty sure if you put your reading list up here, we&#039;d all be put to shame. besides, most of the books on this list are fairly thin. many books but not very many pages.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ryan: that&#8217;s just scary, man. you should never type something like that, or press the publish button.</p>
<p>Matt: what else can be said? we loves us some shane jones. &amp; Babyfucker is worth it. i read it in one sitting. i also like small, pretty books, and it&#8217;s a very small pretty book!</p>
<p>John: i&#8217;m pretty sure if you put your reading list up here, we&#8217;d all be put to shame. besides, most of the books on this list are fairly thin. many books but not very many pages.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Dermot Woods</title>
		<link>http://bigother.com/2009/11/23/what-you-read-what-i-read-part-ii/#comment-555</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[John Dermot Woods]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 01:33:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bigother.com/?p=1354#comment-555</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[You read a lot of damn books, Lily.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You read a lot of damn books, Lily.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt DeBenedictis</title>
		<link>http://bigother.com/2009/11/23/what-you-read-what-i-read-part-ii/#comment-554</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Matt DeBenedictis]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 00:48:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bigother.com/?p=1354#comment-554</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Failure Six may be my favorite thing I have eye consumed this year. 

I really want to read Babyfucker. All I have heard is of smiles and laughs from it. Good ones. Not the shitty smiles and laughs.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Failure Six may be my favorite thing I have eye consumed this year. </p>
<p>I really want to read Babyfucker. All I have heard is of smiles and laughs from it. Good ones. Not the shitty smiles and laughs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ryan W. Bradley</title>
		<link>http://bigother.com/2009/11/23/what-you-read-what-i-read-part-ii/#comment-552</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ryan W. Bradley]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 23:38:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bigother.com/?p=1354#comment-552</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[damn, you know me too well. i was crouched in the bushes of the internet waiting for my moment!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>damn, you know me too well. i was crouched in the bushes of the internet waiting for my moment!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lily Hoang</title>
		<link>http://bigother.com/2009/11/23/what-you-read-what-i-read-part-ii/#comment-551</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Lily Hoang]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 23:37:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bigother.com/?p=1354#comment-551</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Sure you didn&#039;t, Ryan. I know your kind: you were waiting for me to post, just so you could post right after me! 

(smile)

I haven&#039;t read Light Boxes (never got a copy!), but word on the street is that even our dear Mr. Jones prefers Failure...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sure you didn&#8217;t, Ryan. I know your kind: you were waiting for me to post, just so you could post right after me! </p>
<p>(smile)</p>
<p>I haven&#8217;t read Light Boxes (never got a copy!), but word on the street is that even our dear Mr. Jones prefers Failure&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ryan W. Bradley</title>
		<link>http://bigother.com/2009/11/23/what-you-read-what-i-read-part-ii/#comment-549</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ryan W. Bradley]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 23:34:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bigother.com/?p=1354#comment-549</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[hey, didn&#039;t mean to jump on top of your post like that, lily!

i read The Failure Six a week or two ago... i think i may&#039;ve liked it more than Light Boxes.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hey, didn&#8217;t mean to jump on top of your post like that, lily!</p>
<p>i read The Failure Six a week or two ago&#8230; i think i may&#8217;ve liked it more than Light Boxes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

